I watched a stunning movie recently. The movie was Warner Bros. Sherlock Holmes, a tale that was obviously based around the ideas of the book series by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Going into the movie, my thoughts were telling me that the film would just be “one of those movies based on a book series,” but I was surely wrong. Of course, I was stereotyping the genre, something that most viewers and readers do, when I clearly should have been open to the movie. The movie's usage of style and the way it fits the genre make it very entertaining, to the point where it is hard not to watch it.
The movie fits into the “action-mystery” genre, and it gave the viewer a good supply of both parts. That is my normal criteria for a mixed genres, I normally need an equal balance of both pieces. Also, considering the mystery genre, the mystery and plot not only have to be good, but they have to be great. Action is also important in this combination, because it keeps the viewer watching and excited. Sherlock Holmes did not disrupt any of my preconceived notions about the two genres.
There were plenty of fights and explosions to keep the overall action level high and the mystery was amazing, each revealing Sherlock’s exceptional charm. Throughout the movie, Holmes’s exquisite wit created another mystery in the story, making the viewer question how reliable the character was. The moviemakers also included a slow-motion feature in certain complex situations, letting the viewer in on some of the hero's thoughts and plans of action pinpointed on the weaknesses of the people that he would brawl with. As the movie progressed, the storyline unveiled more about Sherlock and Dr. Watson, fixating the audience to see what would happen next. The story also included a touch of romance, which I feel was due to the era portrayed in the film, thus creating a female foil to Holmes that competes with him throughout the film. Like I spoke of before, the action and romance might have even added more captivation than the mystery, giving another type of uncertainty to the viewer. Nevertheless, this film was truly awesome in my opinion.
As you can tell from the vague bits of the story that I have informed you about, reader, you can tell that there was a healthy amount of play with the stereotypical genre, but not too much that the viewer could not follow and was frustrated. If you know me personally, then you know that I am one to get frustrated in a fit of confusion after seeing a movie that breaks the mold of a genre too extremely. As you probably have heard, when using genres, certain criteria fit within them, expectations that the reader or viewer subconsciously has based on what they have seen or read previously. Rest assured, this movie fits in its genre quite snug, giving the viewer a good story while also helping them identify the movie with the genre. Between the characters and the enigmatic storyline, you should be able to notice how great the movie really is. I have included a video link to the movie's trailer at the bottom of this post.
| Picture courtesy of: http://www.yourmoviestuff.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/Sherlock-Holmes-movie-poster_600.jpg |
The trailer can be found at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7aROdTxt6M